Anthropology Home Page

      SSPA Home Page

 

  Department of Anthropology

index**directories*maps*


 
ANTH 600 Preliminary Examination guidelines

 


      Advising

      Alumni

      Careers in Anthropology

   Degrees-Undergraduate

   Degrees-Graduate

   Events and Lectures

   Faculty

      Field School

   Forms

   Internet Resources

      Mission Statement

      Newsletters

      Publications

      Student Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                             Anthropology Club Archaeology Students Association Club

 

The preliminary exam is intended to assess the depth and breadth of student knowledge.

  • The exam consists of questions pertaining to the subject matter of ANTH 501, ANTH 502, and ANTH 503. 
     

  • The instructor of each course will submit three questions from which the student will select two questions to write on.  A file of questions is available in the department. The preliminary assessment will be administered in the department between the hours of 8:00 a.m.-12:00 noon and 1:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m. on the day scheduled for the examination. Students are expected to type their exams on computers provided by the department.
     

  • Examinations will be read by an examination committee of three faculty members.  An additional reader may be selected if deemed appropriate by the committee.  The committee will evaluate the student’s examination using the following rubric scale.
     

  • When the members of the examination committee have reviewed the preliminary exam, they will meet, discuss, and vote on the student’s performance. The student will be notified of the result of the exam by the Graduate Program Coordinator within one week following the exam. 
     

  • Grading of the exam will be Failure (Re-take), Pass, and High Pass.  Failure means the student has not demonstrated depth and breadth by their performance.  Pass indicates admission to candidacy having satisfactorily completed the exam, but maybe the basis upon which the department may recommend the thesis or project track to individual candidates. High Pass recognizes a high level of performance on the preliminary exam and permission to begin the MA thesis or MAA project.
       

  • A student failing the exam may request in writing of the academic unit head (Graduate Program Coordinator) a repeat of the exam.  This request must be submitted within five days of the notification of the student’s failure.  If approved, the student must retake the exam within 12 months after the first attempt.  If the department does not approve a retake of the exam, the student is withdrawn from the program by the Graduate College. 

ANTH 600 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION EVALUATION RUBRIC

1. Knowledge of subject matter demonstrated through responses to posed questions

 

1 = Retake

2 = Pass

3 = High Pass

SCORE

Demonstrates minimal knowledge of the subject matter through production of work that meets some established standards. Responses to posed questions:

Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the subject matter through production of work that meets established standards. Responses to posed questions:

 

Demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the subject matter through production of work that goes beyond established standards.  Responses to posed questions:

 

 

1.a. Insight

Show minimal evidence of insight or original thinking

Show some insight, creativity, and original thinking

Are highly original and creative

 

1.b. Interpretation of disciplinary readings

Exhibit some errors in inter-preting disciplinary readings

Exhibit reasonable interpretation of disciplinary readings

Exhibit reflective interrogation of disciplinary readings

 

1.c. Analysis and synthesis of central concepts of subject

Incorporate minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the subject

Incorporate some analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the subject

Incorporate critical analysis and synthesis of central concepts or the subject

 

1.d. Understanding of link between discipline and other disciplines

Reflect vague understanding of the nature of the discipline and its links to other disciplines

Reflect some understanding of the nature of the discipline and its links to other disciplines

Reflect a holistic view of the nature of the discipline and its links to other disciplines

 

1.e. Use of detail and specific examples

Provide few details and examples

Provide some detail and specific examples

Provide detailed descriptions and numerous specific, vivid examples

 

2. Clarity of Thought

1 = Retake

2 = Pass

3 = High Pass

SCORE

2.a. Use of language and vocabulary

Exhibits adequate but inconsistent facility in the use of language

Uses appropriate language/vocabulary

Uses very precise, skillful language

 

2.b. Demonstration of connections

Demonstrates adequate connections

Moderate to strong connections are made

Strong connections are made

 

2.c. Use of key points

Some key points are demonstrated, but some lapses in coherence or progression of ideas

Most key points are made

Several key points are made

 

2.d. Use of critical ideas

Critical ideas are vague or limited

Critical ideas are included

Outstanding demonstration of critical thinking

 

2.e. Adequacy of responses to questions

Not all parts of question are answered

All parts of the question are fully answered

All parts of the questions are fully answered

 

3. Professional and Presentation Skills

1 = Retake

2 = Pass

3 = High Pass

SCORE

3.a. Presence of errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics

Essay contains an accumulation of errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics

Essay is free of most errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics

The essay is free of most errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics

 

3.b. Organization

Is limited in organization or focus

Is well organized and focused

Clear organization is obvious

 

3.c. Presence of scholarly voice

A lapse in using a scholarly voice is evident

A scholarly voice is used throughout most

A scholarly, thoughtful voice is used throughout. At least 2 citations are used

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 
  1910 University Drive · Boise, Idaho 83725 email:  fbrigha@boisestate.edu   ©2002 Boise State University